🇩🇪 Deutsche Version: Lebendspende

Living organ donation is the donation of a paired or divisible organ by a living person to another person. In contrast to postmortem donation — whether after brain death or after circulatory arrest — the donating person remains alive during and after the donation.

This makes living donation the structurally less problematic path of organ donation: the question of the Dead Donor Rule does not arise, because the donor is alive.

Which organs?

The possibility of living donation depends on the anatomical classification of the organ:

Paired organs:

  • Kidney — the most common form of living donation worldwide. Donor mortality risk about 0.03 percent. One kidney suffices for the donating person.
  • Lung — one lung lobe (lobus) can be donated without the donor dying; the removed portion does not regenerate but is compensated for by the remaining lung.

Divisible organs:

  • Liver — partial liver donation (usually the left liver lobe). Donor mortality risk about 0.28 percent — higher than with the kidney, because the operation is more extensive. The liver regenerates in the donor.
  • Pancreas — a partial segment is possible.
  • Small intestine — a partial segment is possible.

Strictly unpaired organs (no living donation possible):

  • Heart — only postmortem donation is possible. This is the decisive point for the aggravation of the donation-after-circulatory-arrest problem (cf. below).
  • Complete lung or complete liver — only post mortem.

Principle of totality

The moral permissibility of living donation rests on the principle of totality, which Pius XII formulated in 1956 before the Italian Society of Anesthesiology: the part of the body is ordered toward the whole, yet the person may sacrifice a part for the benefit of another person, provided no serious impairment of function follows. A kidney can be donated — the second suffices to live on. The heart cannot — because its removal would mean the death of the donor.

Living donation as a personal-ontological act

John Paul II formulated the personal-ontological depth of living donation in his address to the XVIII International Congress of the Transplantation Society (Rome, 29 August 2000):

„Every organ transplant has its source in a decision of great ethical value: the decision to offer without reward a part of one’s own body for the health and well-being of another person. … Above all, this is a gesture which is a genuine act of love. It is not just a matter of giving away something that belongs to us but of giving something of ourselves.”

Living donation is thus a concrete realization of the personalist norm: an act of affirmation of the other for his own sake. It is self-transcendence in a bodily-concrete form.

Structural asymmetry to donation after circulatory arrest

From the differentiation paired/unpaired follows an ethical asymmetry that is central for the assessment of the practice of donation after circulatory arrest:

Organ typeLiving donation possible?Donation-after-circulatory-arrest assessment under the precautionary principle
Kidney, lung (paired)YesDonation after circulatory arrest is avoidable — living donation is the ethically less problematic alternative
Liver, pancreas (divisible)Yes, with higher riskDonation after circulatory arrest is partly avoidable
Heart (strictly unpaired)NoDonation after circulatory arrest is unavoidable — the DDR-permanence tension becomes structurally maximal

This asymmetry explains why the donation-after-circulatory-arrest heart transplant (Switzerland 2023, 9 countries worldwide) is the sharpest point of the entire donation-after-circulatory-arrest discussion: there is no fallback path via living donation, so the whole ethical burden falls on the permanence-setting of the postmortem donation.

Ontological classification

Superordinate concepts: state of affairs (donation type)

Ontological relations:

  • compatible with (restricted): principle of totality, Dead Donor Rule, personalist norm
  • disjoint with: postmortem donation (donation after circulatory arrest / donation after brain death)
  • permitted for: paired organs (kidney, lung), divisible organs (partial liver, partial pancreas)
  • not possible for: strictly unpaired organs (heart)
  • grounded by: Pius XII (1956), John Paul II (2000)

Chapter assignment: Chapter 4: What Is Human Personhood? (German)

Sources

Magisterial sources

Medical-ethical literature

Statistics and epidemiology

See also